The Hobbit: An
Unexpected Journey (5/10)
by Tony Medley
Run time 169
minutes.
Not for
children.
This super
fantasy stuff is not for me. While I can handle The Chronicles of
Narnia films (two by Disney and the last one by Fox), these films
based on the classic children's books by J.R.R. Tolkien are peopled by
too many fantasy characters and are far, far too long. To sit there for
almost 3 hours and watch this stuff would seem to be beyond torture for
a normal adult.
However, this
film is so well made in terms of production values that it is worth
sitting through at least for a while. The 3-D is exceptional. I saw in
the version that runs 48 frames per second (fps) and the quality of the
picture and the cinematography were stunning. (When sound was introduced
in 1927, 24 fps became the standard for 35mm sound films.) At the faster
frame speed, unlike most pictures shot in 3-D at 24 fps, the color is
not degraded one iota by the 3-D. In fact, in the print I saw, the color
is gorgeous.
The production
values comprise the only reason that could cause me to recommend that
anybody see this movie. These are supposed to be aimed at children, but
I feel that this one is far too violent for children.
This is the first
of the Tolkien books, and it takes place 60 years before the stories
told in the Lord of the Rings trilogy. This has many of the same
characters and actors.
Like Lord of
the Rings, this is going to come out in at least two more films. I
don't anticipate seeing either one of them. The only thing I can compare
sitting through these films with is the torment of sitting through those
Twilight films that are aimed at the mentality of a 13-year-old
female.
But the
production values are so exceptional that one might not get too bummed
out before an hour has expired, even if the content of the first hour is
extraordinarily annoying.
|